<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Jeff Bailey | History</title><link>https://jeffbailey.us/categories/history/</link><description>This website contains learning resources, opinions, and facts about software-related technology.</description><language>en</language><generator>Hugo</generator><atom:link href="https://jeffbailey.us/categories/history/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>A History of AI and Machine Learning</title><link>https://jeffbailey.us/blog/2026/04/14/a-history-of-ai-ml/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://jeffbailey.us/blog/2026/04/14/a-history-of-ai-ml/</guid><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><dc:creator>Jeff Bailey</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><category>History</category><description><![CDATA[<p>The history of AI is a story about math that already existed, people stubborn enough to believe in it, and a few decades of everyone else telling them they were wrong.</p>
<p>Most of the math powering today&rsquo;s large language models comes from the 17th and 18th centuries. Calculus, linear algebra, probability theory. The machines caught up to the math, not the other way around.</p>
<p>I picked up <a href="https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/677608/why-machines-learn-by-anil-ananthaswamy/">Why Machines Learn</a> by Anil Ananthaswamy because I wanted to understand what actually happened, not the hype version. The book traces the mathematical lineage from early pattern recognition through deep learning with the kind of rigor and storytelling that made me rethink how I understood the whole field.</p>]]></description></item></channel></rss>